| | SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks | |
| |
Do you think this is a good idea and should be in verincraft? | yes i do think this should be put into verincraft | | 44% | [ 4 ] | no i do not like this idea. it should not be in verincraft | | 56% | [ 5 ] |
| Total Votes : 9 | | |
| Author | Message |
---|
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message | thegamer542 Active Member
Posts : 105 Points : 4612 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2012-06-24 Age : 28 Location : AMERICAAAAA
| Subject: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:38 pm | |
| member ranks. (these are only suggestion feel free to make changes)
trusted>builder>skilled_builder>master_builder trusted>soldier>skilled_soldier>master soldier trusted>commander>skilled_commander>master_commander trusted>Raider>Skilled_raider>master_raider
Builder rank to get Trusted:must be on server for 2-4 weeks to get Builder:must have built a nice house (not plain) to get Skilled_builder:must have build a very nice house (furnished well and such) to get Master_builder: must have built a stunning house
Soldier Rank to get Trusted:must be on server for 2-4 weeks to get Soldier:must have successfully killed 3 people in pvp in a row (seen by mods or admins or higher) to get Skilled solider:must have successfully killed 6 people in pvp in a row to get Master soldier: must have successfully killed 12 people in pvp in a row
Commander rank to get trusted:must be on server for 2-4 weeks to get Commander:must create a faction with 3 or more people to get Skilled commander:must create a faction with 6 or more people to get Master commander:must create a faction with 8 people or more
Raider rank to get Trusted:must be on server for 2-4 weeks to get Raider:must successfully raid a house or base to get Skilled raider:must successfully raid 3 houses or bases or more to get Master raider:must successfully raid 3 factions
each rank would have a reward. (as seen below)
builder reward:half a stack of any building block of their choice (not gold or diamond blocks or tnt of course) skilled builder reward:a stack of any building block of their choice master builder reward: 6 diamonds or two stacks of any building block of their choice
soldier rank reward: 2 diamonds skilled soldier reward: 4 diamonds master soldier reward: 8 diamonds
commander reward: small faction powerboost skilled commander reward: a book written about you dedicated to you and your leadership master commander: a diamond sword that is named whatever you want
raider reward: 2 diamonds skilled raider reward: 4 diamonds master raider reward: full leather armor (dyed any color they wish) | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:55 pm | |
| oh, nevermind my last post, i see how you earn it, except for the builder thing i think its ideal and doable |
| | | GDION Owner
Posts : 412 Points : 4915 Reputation : 24 Join date : 2012-07-21 Age : 29 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:03 pm | |
| Too much to manage, and it's easy to lie to gain it, also to easy to obtain. People will amass the ranks within a few days. Also contrasts heavily with donator ranks making them less "wantable".
I'd go against this, as it seems like a waste of time and a useless consumption of it, also easy to lie to gain / conflicts for no reason. | |
| | | The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message | thegamer542 Active Member
Posts : 105 Points : 4612 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2012-06-24 Age : 28 Location : AMERICAAAAA
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:25 pm | |
| - GDION wrote:
- Too much to manage, and it's easy to lie to gain it, also to easy to obtain. People will amass the ranks within a few days. Also contrasts heavily with donator ranks making them less "wantable".
I'd go against this, as it seems like a waste of time and a useless consumption of it, also easy to lie to gain / conflicts for no reason. i forgot to include that a admin would have to see it happen for the person to get promoted. | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:43 pm | |
| - thegamer542 wrote:
- GDION wrote:
- Too much to manage, and it's easy to lie to gain it, also to easy to obtain. People will amass the ranks within a few days. Also contrasts heavily with donator ranks making them less "wantable".
I'd go against this, as it seems like a waste of time and a useless consumption of it, also easy to lie to gain / conflicts for no reason. i forgot to include that a admin would have to see it happen for the person to get promoted. hmm gdion does have a great point, but it also is kind of a good idea, maybe we could reduce it to just 2-3 ranks or something? kind of like the ranks on the forums, where its like noob, loyal, trusted, etc? i think that might make a good compromise? |
| | | The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message | thegamer542 Active Member
Posts : 105 Points : 4612 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2012-06-24 Age : 28 Location : AMERICAAAAA
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:35 pm | |
| - CaptainSaac wrote:
- thegamer542 wrote:
- GDION wrote:
- Too much to manage, and it's easy to lie to gain it, also to easy to obtain. People will amass the ranks within a few days. Also contrasts heavily with donator ranks making them less "wantable".
I'd go against this, as it seems like a waste of time and a useless consumption of it, also easy to lie to gain / conflicts for no reason. i forgot to include that a admin would have to see it happen for the person to get promoted. hmm gdion does have a great point, but it also is kind of a good idea, maybe we could reduce it to just 2-3 ranks or something? kind of like the ranks on the forums, where its like noob, loyal, trusted, etc? i think that might make a good compromise? yeah alright | |
| | | zamman Active Member
Posts : 105 Points : 4615 Reputation : 5 Join date : 2012-06-06 Location : Not here
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:00 pm | |
| It doesn't sound like a good idea. The rewards are too high and too needy. The ranks will determine how people pick for factions, people would only hire soldiers and commanders in their faction, you don't need builders on an anarchy server; everything is obsidian, and lastly everyone is a raider; you can't avoid raiding forever. They're nice suggestions, but they'd screw up the server too much | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks | |
| |
| | | | SmiteKings suggestion for member ranks | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| Statistics | We have 1540 registered users The newest registered user is G__G_Goku
Our users have posted a total of 9242 messages in 1660 subjects
|
Who is online? | In total there are 78 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 78 Guests
None
Most users ever online was 136 on Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:26 am
|
Poll | | Winnner of the Contest? | thesmith2010 - (No prize, vote if good) | | 24% | [ 8 ] | o0pedro0o | | 12% | [ 4 ] | Dmah | | 6% | [ 2 ] | ragdollkilla12 | | 12% | [ 4 ] | CodeNameSHADOW | | 9% | [ 3 ] | Jlhudson | | 12% | [ 4 ] | Snowy_Stuff | | 6% | [ 2 ] | Mr_Zeepic | | 9% | [ 3 ] | Quazimofo | | 12% | [ 4 ] |
| Total Votes : 34 |
|
|